Roddy v. Correctional Medical Services et al
Troy Roddy |
Correctional Medical Services, Corizon Inc and Correct Care Solution |
2:2014cv00057 |
April 21, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Helena Office |
Lee |
James M. Moody |
Joe J. Volpe |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 35 ORDER ADOPTING 34 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition. Defendants' 32 Motion to Dismiss for failure to prosecute is GRANTED. Plaintiff's cause of action is DISMISSED without prejudice due to his failure to prosecute. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 5/1/2015. (mcz) |
Filing 14 ORDER ADOPTING 12 Proposed Findings and Recommended Partial Disposition. Defendants Becker, Chavis, Chu, Corizon, Inc., Harrell, Henderson, Hibbs, Hobbs, Hill, Kelley, Knudsen, Lachney, Mansfield, Morris, Person, Pittman, Sffhausurry, and Strick land are DISMISSED without prejudice due to Plaintiff's failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; Defendants Correctional Medical Services and Correct Care Solution are DISMISSED without prejudice as they are the same entity as Corizon, Inc. Plaintiff's 3 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is DENIED as moot. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 7/14/2014. (mcz) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.