Sentell v. Horton

Plaintiff: Wanda Sentell
Defendant: Eutaw Horton
Case Number: 4:2008cv00630
Filed: July 23, 2008
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Civil Rights: Accommodations Office
County: Lonoke
Presiding Judge: William R. Wilson
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:3601 Fair Housing Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 18, 2009 12 Opinion or Order of the Court LETTER ORDER giving deft until 12:00 noon on Tuesday, August 25, 2009, to file a response to the 8 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Wanda Sentell. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 8/18/09. (bkp)
October 23, 2009 16 Opinion or Order of the Court CONSENT DECREE. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 10/23/09. (bkp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sentell v. Horton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wanda Sentell
Represented By: Edward I. Zwilling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eutaw Horton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.