Kelly Foundation Inc v. Quapaw House Inc

Plaintiff: Kelly Foundation Inc
Defendant: Quapaw House Inc
Case Number: 4:2008cv04141
Filed: November 7, 2008
Court: Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office: Copyright Office
County: Pulaski
Presiding Judge: James M. Moody
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 10, 2009 10 Opinion or Order of the Court CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 3/10/09. (bkp)
November 20, 2009 14 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT based on the agreement between Plaintiff and Defendant. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 11/20/09. (mkf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kelly Foundation Inc v. Quapaw House Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kelly Foundation Inc
Represented By: Joseph Davidson Calhoun, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quapaw House Inc
Represented By: Joseph Patrick McKay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.