Marshall v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company et al
| Theresa Marshall |
| Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage |
| 4:2010cv00754 |
| June 30, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Pulaski |
| William R. Wilson |
| Other Contract |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
AMENDED ORDER AND JUDGMENT AMENDING 22 Order 15 Order 23 Judgment to dismiss with prejudice all of plaintiff's claims, and defts are dismissed with prejudice as parties to this action. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 2/3/11. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
23
JUDGMENT re 22 Order dismissing defts Wells Fargo and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company without prejudice and dismissing plaintiff's claims without prejudice. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 2/1/11. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER lifting the Stay on the 15 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, and limiting discovery efforts to Plaintiff's claim that notice required by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act was insufficient or improper if the debt was disputed, and to Plaintiff's claims brought under the Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 12/29/10. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER granting 11 Motion to Stay Discovery pending a decision on defts' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 12/9/10. (bkp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
