Jones v. Gann et al
| Charles Edward Jones, Sr |
| Chris Gann, D Kirby Wright, Brandi Turner and Jill Kamp |
| 4:2011cv00701 |
| September 23, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Pulaski |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER denying pltf's 27 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/18/12. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
25
JUDGMENT pursuant to 24 Opinion and Order entered this date, judgment is hereby entered in favor of Chris Gann, and D Kirby Wright dismissing the complaint of Charles Edward Jones, Sr.; pltf's federal law claims are dismissed with prejudice, and the state law claims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/11/12. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER that pltf's amended complaint against Turner and Kamp is dismissed; the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve summons and amended complaint on defts Gann and Wright; denying as moot pltf's 13 Motion for Subpoena Duces Tecum. Jill Kamp and Brandi Turner terminated. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 11/28/11. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
6
JUDGMENT pursuant to 5 Opinion and Order entered this date, judgment is hereby entered dismissing this action without prejudice; the relief sought is denied. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 10/17/11. (vjt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
