PerfectVision Manufacturing Inc v. PPC Broadband Inc
PerfectVision Manufacturing Inc |
PPC Broadband Inc |
4:2012cv00623 |
October 4, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Little Rock Office |
Pulaski |
J. Leon Holmes |
Patent |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 110 AGREED ORDER TO DISMISS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/13/2015. (ks) |
Filing 102 OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/29/2014. (ks) |
Filing 88 E-DISCOVERY ORDER. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 7/3/2014. (jak) |
Filing 81 ORDER in light of the opinion issued by the United States Supreme Court in Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc., No. 13-369, the parties must file simultaneous supplemental briefs on June 24, 2014. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 6/3/2014. (jak) |
Filing 37 ORDER denying Defendant PPC Broadband Inc's 13 Motion to Dismiss Complaint and 29 Motion to transfer the action to the Northern District of New York. Plaintiff PerfectVision Manufacturing Inc's 28 Second Motion to Amend Co mplaint is granted; Plaintiff's 20 First Motion to Amend Complaint is denied as moot. Plaintiff's 31 Motion to enjoin PPC from proceeding with its action against PerfectVision in the Northern District of New York is denied. Motions terminated. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 6/10/2013. (mcz) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.