Thompson v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company et al
| Phillip T Thompson |
| Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc and Sutton Funding LLC |
| 4:2013cv00120 |
| March 6, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Pulaski |
| Susan Webber Wright |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
304
ORDER granting 302 defendant's unopposed motion to dismiss with prejudice; dismissing with prejudice any remaining claims pending in this lawsuit, with each party to bear his or its own costs and attorneys' fees; and denying as moot 299 BONY's motion for appointment of commissioner. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 10/3/2019. (jbh)
|
|
Filing
255
OPINION AND ORDER granting BONY's 238 motion for partial summary judgment; and denying as moot Mr. Thompson's 250 motion for leave to file motion to strike untimely reply in light of his 251 withdrawal of that same motion. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 9/21/2016. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
144
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying 127 motion to alter judgment; denying 128 motion for reconsideration; denying 126 138 requests for judicial notice. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 5/12/2014. (mmd) (Docket text modified on 5/12/2014 to correc the description of the document filed).(jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
