United Fire & Casualty Company v. Reyes et al
| United Fire & Casualty Company |
| Claude Wheeler, Fredis Reyes and Judy Wheeler |
| Claude Wheeler and Judy Wheeler |
| Claude Wheeler and Judy Wheeler |
| 4:2013cv00123 |
| March 7, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Out of State |
| James M. Moody |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
44
JUDGMENT : Plaintiff is entitled to declaratory Judgment on its 1 Complaint as follows:(1) The Commercial General Liability policy at issue provides no policy benefits for the claims against Fredis Reyes arising out of the incident that occurred o n November 4, 2008 at the Audubon Pointe Apartments in Maumelle; (2) United Fire is under no obligation to provide a defense to Fredis Reyes as to any claim arising out of this incident ; and (3) United Fire is under no obligation to satisfy any j udgment entered against Fredis Reyes or to indemnify Fredis Reyes for any judgment rendered against him arising out of the incident. The 3 counterclaim for declaratory judgment filed by Judy and Claude Wheeler should be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 4/14/2014. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
