Raymo et al v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Kevin Raymo and Heather Raymo
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation, Sanofi Pasteur Inc, Vaxserve Inc and GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Case Number: 4:2013cv00697
Filed: December 9, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Little Rock Office
County: Lonoke
Presiding Judge: D. P. Marshall
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER granting as modified 35 Joint Motion to Stay. The Motions to Dismiss are denied without prejudice, 9 14 . The case is administratively terminated. After the Vaccine Court proceeding is complete, any party may move to reopen this case and lift the stay. If no one so moves by 31 March 2016, the Court will reopen the case and dismiss it without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/31/2014. (jak)
March 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER: Despite the Court's and the parties' best efforts, attempts to set a hearing on the pending motions to dismiss have been unsuccessful. The Court will rule on the motions by 28 March 2014 unless a party requests some other form of relief. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/18/2014. (jak)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Raymo et al v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Raymo
Represented By: Stephen C. Parker, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heather Raymo
Represented By: Stephen C. Parker, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation
Represented By: Martin A. Kasten
Represented By: James M. Simpson, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sanofi Pasteur Inc
Represented By: J. Dennis Chambers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vaxserve Inc
Represented By: J. Dennis Chambers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Represented By: Adria W. Conklin
Represented By: Lyn Peeples Pruitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?