Torti Sr v. Hoag et al
Richard A Torti Sr |
Debra Hoag, Gentry Partners Limited and John Hancock Life Insurance Company USA |
4:2014cv00330 |
June 2, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Little Rock Office |
Pulaski |
J. Leon Holmes |
Other Personal Property Damage |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 114 OPINION AND ORDER granting 88 John Hancock Life Insurance Company USA's motion to dismiss; and dismissing, with prejudice, 1 the complaint of Richard A. Torti, Sr., as successor Trustee of the Stuart Family 1997 Trust. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 2/26/2016. (kdr) |
Filing 35 OPINION AND ORDER granting 21 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 23 Motion to Dismiss; granting 30 Motion to Strike. All of Richard Torti's claims against John Hancock Life Insurance Company are dismissed without prejudice. Richard Torti's claims against Debra Hoag and Gentry Partners Limited for deceit, violation of the Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, and civil conspiracy are dismissed without prejudice. Richard Torti has stated claims against Hoag and Gentry Partners for breach of fiduciary duty and negligence as regards the $1.7 million policy loan plus interest, so those claims are not dismissed. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 10/17/2014. (ks) |
Filing 20 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR - DISREGARD (wrong case). (ks) (Docket text modified on 8/4/2014.) (thd). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.