Allen v. Staley et al
| Shaun C Allen |
| John Staley, Bufford, John Does, Lonoke County and Dallas |
| 4:2014cv00481 |
| August 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Faulkner |
| Jerome T. Kearney |
| James M. Moody |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
ORDER ADOPTING 82 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's 69 Motion for Summary Judgment and 73 Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment are DENIED. Defendants' 75 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiffs complaint against Defendants Staley, Bufford, Dallas, and Grigsby is DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff's complaint against John Does is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 6/29/2015. (mcz)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER adopting 57 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety and denying 52 Motion for Order, which is construed as a Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 3/5/2015. (thd)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING 6 Partial Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's 12 Motion to Amend Complaint is denied, and Defendant Lonoke County is DISMISSED from this action, without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/9/2014. (mcz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
