Most Worshipful Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons of the State of Arkansas v. DCG/UGOC Equity Fund LLC et al
Most Worshipful Grand Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons of the State of Arkansas |
DCG/UGOC Equity Fund LLC, DCG/UGOC Funds Management LLC, DCG Funds Managment LLC, United Group of Companies Inc, Pageone Financial Inc, Edgar R Page and John Does |
4:2015cv00219 |
April 17, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Little Rock Office |
Pulaski |
J. Leon Holmes |
Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 110 OPINION AND ORDER granting the defendants' 101 motion for summary judgment or in the alternative motion for judgment on the pleadings. This action is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/18/2017. (ljb) |
Filing 100 OPINION AND ORDER granting Equity Fund and the United Group's 65 motion for summary judgment. All of the Lodge's claims against the Equity Fund and the United Group are dismissed with prejudice. The Lodge moved for leave to file its s econd amended complaint as a means of responding to the motion for summary judgment filed by the Equity Fund and the United Group. Because the Court has granted that motion for summary judgment, the 81 motion for leave to amend is denied as moot. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 10/19/2016. (ljb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.