Microsoft Corporation v. Delta Computer Experts LLC et al
| Microsoft Corporation |
| Delta Computer Experts LLC and Lloyd A Franklin, II |
| 5:2008cv00168 |
| June 9, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Copyright Office |
| Out of State |
| James M. Moody |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 17:501 Copyright Infringement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Microsoft Corporation against Delta Computer Experts LLC, Lloyd A Franklin, II in the amount of $970,000 plus attorneys' fees and costs in the amount of $8,822.41 28 . The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this judgment and the permanent injunction directly to the defts and defts' counsel. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 4/1/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER granting 21 Motion for Attorney Fees and ordering the defendants to pay plaintiff's fees in the amount of $1690. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 2/11/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER striking the defendants' 3 Answer and directing the Clerk to enter a default against the defendants. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 2/6/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER granting 13 Motion to Compel and directing defts to make their initial disclosures and provide complete and full answers and responses to plaintiff's discovery request within ten days from the date of this Order; and denying 16 Motion to Continue as moot. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 12/15/08. (bkp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
