Lamar v. Hubbard et al
| Anthony Deshawn Lamar |
| Connie Hubbard and Micheline Olson |
| 5:2014cv00345 |
| September 12, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Lincoln |
| Beth Deere |
| James M. Moody |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
ORDER ADOPTING 92 Recommended Disposition. Anthony Deshawn Lamar's claims are DISMISSED, with prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 1/5/2016. (mcz)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER allowing Mr. Lamar to file a response opposing the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant Hubbard. To be considered, the response must be filed within fourteen days of this Order. If Mr. Lamar files a response, he must also file a separate, short statement setting forth the disputed facts that he believes must be decided at a trial. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 9/18/2015. (jak)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to re-issue summons for Ms. Olson at her last known address, as provided under seal. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve the summons, with a copy of the 2 Complaint and any attachments, without requiring prepayment of fees and costs or the posting of security. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 10/10/2014. (jak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
