Releford v. Lester et al
Marcus Releford |
Miriam Lester, Mark Colbert, John Felts, Ray Hobbs and Larry Crane |
5:2014cv00420 |
November 18, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Pine Bluff Office |
Chicot |
Kristine G. Baker |
H. David Young |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 JUDGMENT: Consistent with the 38 Order that was entered on this day and the 32 Order previously entered by the Court on 09/08/2015, it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that this case is hereby dismissed. This Court dismisses without prejudic e plaintiff Marcus Releford's claims against defendants Miriam Lester, Mark Colbert, John Felts, and Ray Hobbs and dismisses with prejudice his claims against defendant Larry Crane consistent with this Court's Orders. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 09/12/2016. (rhm) |
Filing 28 ORDER directing the Clerk to forward an IFP application to Plaintiff. Plaintiff is directed to submit the remaining balance of the $350.00 statutory filing fee, or to complete and sign the IFP application, and file it, no later than 30 days afte r the entry date of this Order. Plaintiff's failure to do so will result in the recommended dismissal of his complaint. In response to Plaintiff's request for a case update, the Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of the docket sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerry W. Cavaneau on 6/19/2015. (jak) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.