Palmer v. Beebe et al
| William Edward Palmer |
| Mike Beebe and Does |
| 5:2014cv00452 |
| December 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Izard |
| D. P. Marshall |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
JUDGMENT: Palmer's claims against Beebe, Cashion, and the Doe Defendants are dismissed without prejudice based on Palmer's substituted complaint. Palmer's claims against Suggs are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/29/2015. (jak)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER adopting unopposed recommendation, 15 . Motions to dismiss, 9 and 12 , denied. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/10/2015. (jak)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER directing the Clerk to prepare a summons for Suggs and the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve the summons, substituted complaint, and this Order on her without prepayment of fees and costs or security. Palmer hasn't pleaded any claims against former Governor Beebe, the John Does, or Cashion. The Court therefore dismisses them without prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/2/2015. (jak)
|
|
Filing
3
INITIAL ORDER pro se prisoners. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 12/22/2014. (kcs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
