Rainer v. Kelley

Rainer v. Kelley

Plaintiff:	Shawn Trevell Rainer
Defendant:	Wendy Kelley
Case Number:	5:2015cv00153
Filed:	May 13, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office:	Pine Bluff Office
County:	Lincoln
Presiding Judge:	Jerome T. Kearney
Presiding Judge:	Brian S. Miller
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 2, 2016	Filing 20 ORDER adopting 17 the proposed findings and recommendations in all respects; and denying, with prejudice, 1 Petitioner's Writ of Habeas Corpus because, just as petitioner's first, second, third, and fifth grounds for relief, petitioner 's fourth ground for relief is without merit. A certificate of appealability may, however, issue on petitioner's fourth ground for relief because he has made substantial showing of a denial of constitutional right. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 2/2/2016. (kdr)
October 14, 2015	Filing 14 ORDER adopting 11 the proposed findings and recommendations; denying Petitioner Shawn Rainer's first, second, third, and fifth grounds for relief; and directing the parties to submit further briefings with regards to Rainer's fourth groun d for relief within 45 days of this order. No further extensions of time will be given. A certificate of appealability will not issue because Rainer has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/14/2015. (kdr)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 2, 2016

Filing 20 ORDER adopting 17 the proposed findings and recommendations in all respects; and denying, with prejudice, 1 Petitioner's Writ of Habeas Corpus because, just as petitioner's first, second, third, and fifth grounds for relief, petitioner 's fourth ground for relief is without merit. A certificate of appealability may, however, issue on petitioner's fourth ground for relief because he has made substantial showing of a denial of constitutional right. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 2/2/2016. (kdr)

October 14, 2015

Filing 14 ORDER adopting 11 the proposed findings and recommendations; denying Petitioner Shawn Rainer's first, second, third, and fifth grounds for relief; and directing the parties to submit further briefings with regards to Rainer's fourth groun d for relief within 45 days of this order. No further extensions of time will be given. A certificate of appealability will not issue because Rainer has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/14/2015. (kdr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rainer v. Kelley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawn Trevell Rainer
Represented By:	John Wesley Hall, Jr.
Represented By:	Sarah Mariam Pourhosseini
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Wendy Kelley
Represented By:	Karen Virginia Wallace
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?