Steffy v. Sodexo Inc. et al
| Noah Steffy |
| Susan Sherwood, Jim Huffman, Sodexo Inc. and Rebecca Atwood |
| 2:2013cv02113 |
| April 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas |
| Fort Smith Office |
| Sebastian |
| Jimm Larry Hendren |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER granting 22 Joint Motion to Dismiss with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on December 10, 2013. (sh)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 8 , denying 11 Motion to Appoint Counsel and Motion to Amend/Correct. Plaintiff's claims against Susan Sherwood, Rebecca Atwood and Jim Huffman are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren on September 10, 2013. (sh)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER granting 5 Motion for Service and DIRECTING SERVICE on Sodexo Inc., by serving its registered agent, Corporate Creations Network, Inc. at 609 S.W. 8th St., #600, Bentonville, AR 72712 by certified mail, return receipt requested. Defendant i s to answer within 21 days from the date of service, and this ORDER DIRECTS THE U.S. MARSHAL TO PERFECT SERVICE without costs or security therefor. The clerk is further directed to issue summons and a USM285 for the defendant. Signed by Honorable Erin L. Setser on July 24, 2013. (sh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
