Bordock v. Wal Mart Stores Inc
Plaintiff: Laurie Bordock
Defendant: Wal Mart Stores Inc
Case Number: 2:2014cv02035
Filed: February 26, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Arkansas
Office: Fort Smith Office
County: U.S., Outside State
Presiding Judge: Robert T. Dawson
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER ADOPTING 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute and for failure to obey the orders of this Court. Signed by Honorable Robert T. Dawson on September 9, 2014. (lw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bordock v. Wal Mart Stores Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wal Mart Stores Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laurie Bordock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?