Leonard v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Carol M. Leonard
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 3:2012cv02526
Filed: October 17, 2012
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Anthony J. Battaglia
Referring Judge: Mitchell D. Dembin
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42:206 Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 12, 2014 26 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 24 , and overruling plaintiff's Objections to the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 18 is denied. Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment 19 is granted. The Clerk of Court is instructed to close the case and enter judgment. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 3/12/14.(kaj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Leonard v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carol M. Leonard
Represented By: Young Chul Cho
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.