Cooper v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Carol A. Cooper
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 3:2012cv02673
Filed: November 2, 2012
Court: California Southern District Court
Office: San Diego Office
County: San Diego
Referring Judge: David H. Bartick
Presiding Judge: Anthony J. Battaglia
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 7, 2014 19 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER: 1) Adopting 18 Report and Recommendation; 2) granting Plaintiff's 11 Motion for Summary Judgment; 3) denying Defendant's 15 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment; 4) Remanding for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Anthony J. Battaglia on 1/7/14. (certified order sent to SSA). (cge)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cooper v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carol A. Cooper
Represented By: Steven G Rosales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.