Scott v. Domus Construction and Design, Inc. et al
| Sean Scott |
| Does 1-10 and Domus Construction and Design, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Statewide |
| 3:2021cv00623 |
| April 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Roger T Benitez |
| Allison H Goddard |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 0101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sean Scott. Domus Construction and Design, Inc. served. (Saccuzzo, Jason) (mme).
|
|
Filing 3
Amended Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (fth) (dlg).
|
|
Filing 2
Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (fth) (dlg)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Domus Construction and Design, Inc., Does 1-10 ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-15547330.), filed by Sean Scott. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibits, #3 Copyright Form) [Copyright Form Mailed]The new case number is 3:21-cv-623-BEN-AHG. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard are assigned to the case. (Saccuzzo, Jason)(fth) (dlg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
