Moore v. Dickhaut
Petitioner - Appellant: ANTHONY MOORE
Respondent - Appellee: THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent
Case Number: 14-1400
Filed: April 16, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Nature of Suit: General (Habeas Corpus)

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 22, 2016 Summary Moore v. Dickhaut

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 107083540 OPINION issued by Jeffrey R. Howard, Chief Appellate Judge; Juan R. Torruella, Appellate Judge and David J. Barron, Appellate Judge. Published. [14-1400]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Moore v. Dickhaut
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: ANTHONY MOORE
Represented By: Anthony Moore
Represented By: Edward J. O'Brien
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent
Represented By: Argiro Kosmetatos Shapiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?