Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Snell v. Neville, et al
as 19-2018
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICIA RUZE, MONSERRATE QUINONES, STEPHANIE Y. COLLINS and others
Defendant:
THOMAS DEMOURA, THERESA SMITH, CLESELY M. GARCIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMORY G. SNELL, JR.
Lopes v. Dickhaut, et al
as 16-2119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANILO LOPES
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent, ANTHONY MENDONSA, THOMAS M. TOCCI and others
Defendant:
JOHN BELAND, PETER WALKER, RANDY FISHER and others
Smith v. Dickhaut
as 15-1770
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES J. SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent
Jones v. Gelb, et al
as 15-1680
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO JONES
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, The Commisioner of the Department of Correction (DOC), THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent of S.B.C.C, ROBBY R. DOBB, The Liutenant at S.B.C.C and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE GELB, Former Deputy Superintendent of Operation at S.B.C.C, JOE FREITAS, The Lieutenant at MCI, CJ, MICHAEL D. FARLEY, The Sergeant at S.B.C.C and others
Moore v. Dickhaut
as 14-1400
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTHONY MOORE
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent
Rasheed v. D'Antonio, et al
as 14-1220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RASHAD AKEEM RASHEED
Defendant - Appellee:
ANGELA D'ANTONIO, MARLENE DODGE, DYANA NICKL and others
In re: Jones, et al
as 14-1168
Petitioner:
ANTONIO JONES
Respondent:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Commisioner of the Department of Corrections, BRUCE GELB, former Deputy Superintendent of Operation at S.B.C.C., THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent of S.B.C.C. and others
Mosher v. Dickhaut
as 13-1863
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK R. MOSHER
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent
Pena v. Dickhaut
as 13-1193
Petitioner - Appellant:
YODERNY PENA
Respondent - Appellee:
THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent
Gullick v. Dickhaut
as 12-1800
Petitioner:
RONALD H. GULLICK
Respondent:
THOMAS DICKHAUT, Superintendent, NCCI/Gardner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
