CoMentis Inc v. Purdue Research Foundation

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Indiana Northern District CoMentis Inc v. Purdue Research Foundation

CoMentis Inc v. Purdue Research Foundation

Plaintiff:	CoMentis Inc
Defendant:	Purdue Research Foundation
Case Number:	4:2009cv00082
Filed:	November 16, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
Office:	Lafayette Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Andrew P Rodovich
Presiding Judge:	Theresa L Springmann
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 25, 2011	Filing 80 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 50 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Purdue's motion is granted with respect to Count 9 and denied with respect to Counts 4, 5, 6, and 10. Because the allegations in the Second Amended Complaint preclude recovery under an unjust enrichment theory, Count 9 is dismissed with prejudice. Granting Arun Ghosh's 53 Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for a More Definite Statement. Counts 7 & 8 are dismissed without prejudice. CoMentis may file an amended complaint curing the issues raised by this Opinion and Order with respect to Counts 7 & 8 by 2/25/2011. Amended Complaint to be filed by 2/25/2011. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 1/25/2011 (csi)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 25, 2011

Filing 80 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 50 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Purdue's motion is granted with respect to Count 9 and denied with respect to Counts 4, 5, 6, and 10. Because the allegations in the Second Amended Complaint preclude recovery under an unjust enrichment theory, Count 9 is dismissed with prejudice. Granting Arun Ghosh's 53 Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for a More Definite Statement. Counts 7 & 8 are dismissed without prejudice. CoMentis may file an amended complaint curing the issues raised by this Opinion and Order with respect to Counts 7 & 8 by 2/25/2011. Amended Complaint to be filed by 2/25/2011. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 1/25/2011 (csi)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CoMentis Inc v. Purdue Research Foundation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: CoMentis Inc
Represented By:	James W Riley, Jr
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Purdue Research Foundation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?