Micius et al v. Bailey et al
| Jimmy J. Micius and Elsie M Mayard |
| Jhon Does, Jane Does, Adam Bailey, Siegfried Neubrand, Mark A. Nelson, Robert Winsor, Kelly Booker, Lisa Martin, Jason badge, Badge number 384515, Badge number 690835 and Badge number 080414 |
| 0:2008cv05853 |
| October 28, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Hennepin |
| Nelson |
| Tunheim |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
110
ORDER denying 107 Motion for New Trial (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on November 2, 2011. (DML) CC: Mayard. (KT)
|
|
Filing
60
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part defendants' 44 Motion for Summary Judgment. (1) The motion is granted as to Count One, in regards to the February 22, 2009 incident only , and that claim is dismissed with prejudice. (2) The motion is granted as to Counts Two, Three, and Four of the plaintiff's federal law claims, and those claims are dismissed with prejudice. (3) The motion on Count On e (excessive force) is denied as to the December 25, 2007 incident. (4) Plaintiff may amend her complaint to properly articulate her state law claim of battery. (5) Plaintiff's state claim of trespass to chattel is dismissed without prejudice. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on February 8, 2011. (DML)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
