Rognirhar v. Kinlund et al
Case Number: 4:2005cv03130
Filed: May 25, 2005
Court: US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Office: 4 Lincoln Office
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bataillon
Presiding Judge: Pro Se Docket
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2005 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PRISONER PAYMENT ORDER granting plaintiff's 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The plaintiff shall pay an initial partial filing fee of $26.39 by July 15, 2005, unless an enlargement of time is granted in response to a writ ten motion; in the absence of the initial partial filing fee by the specified deadline, this case may be subject to dismissal. After payment of the initial partial filing fee, the plaintiff's institution shall collect the additional monthly paym ents in the manner set forth in 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2), quoted above, and shall forward those installments to the court. The plaintiff shall review the "Notice Regarding Summons Forms" attached to this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge F. A. Gossett on 6/10/2005. (Copy mailed to Inga Hookstra, Department of Correctional Services) (CS, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nebraska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rognirhar v. Kinlund et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?