US District Court for the District of Nebraska
Cases 1 - 10 of 16,587
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03220
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hamburger v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv03219
Plaintiff:
Leah A. Hamburger
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03218
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Graham v. United States
as 8:2024cv00459
Petitioner:
Jonathan S. Graham
Respondent:
Joe Biden, Bureau of Prisons and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wilson v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Chiquita Wilson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hutchens v. Hi-Speed Group Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv03217
Plaintiff:
Patrick Hutchens
Defendant:
Hi-Speed Group Inc., Ag Valley Cooperative and Manpreet Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03216
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Knight v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Phyllis M. Knight
Defendant:
State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moody v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv00456
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Victor J. Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
