US District Court for the District of Nebraska Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,755
Knight v. USA
as 8:2024cv00497
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard Allen Knight
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dowsing v. Douglas County Corrections et al
as 8:2024cv00491
Defendant:
Cervantes and Douglas County Corrections
Plaintiff:
Trey Dowsing and Treyvon Mahleic Dowsing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Strigenz
as 8:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Riley P. Smith
Defendant:
Thomas P. Strigenz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lorenzo-Cruz v. USA
as 8:2024cv00484
Petitioner:
Tomas Lorenzo-Cruz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wiig v. USA
as 8:2024cv00483
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Charles E. Wiig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Olona v. Jansen et al
as 8:2024cv00476
Respondent:
Omaha Correctional Center and Jansen
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Louis A. Olona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guidry v. Palermo
as 8:2024cv00477
Defendant:
Johnny Palermo
Plaintiff:
Reginal D. Guidry, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hood-Bey v. Brown et al
as 8:2024cv00474
Defendant:
Dr. Alyssa Bish, Grant A. Forsberg, Douglas County Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Hood-Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooks et al v. Attorney General of the State of Neb.
as 8:2024cv00471
Petitioner:
Keith Brooks
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
United States District Court for the District of Omaha, Neb and Attorney General of the State of Neb.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ingnico v. Strigenz
as 8:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Jesus Ingnico
Defendant:
Thomas P. Strigenz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
