The Way International et al v. Executive Risk Indemnity Inc. et al
The Way International and The Way International, Inc. |
Executive Risk Indemnity Inc., Executive Risk Inc., Chubb & Son, Inc., Baldwin & Whitney Insurance Agency Inc, Acordia Of Ohio LLC, Acordia Inc, Wells Fargo Insurance Services Of Ohio LLC, Chubb Group of Insurance Companies, Chubb Executive Risk Inc, Chubb Indemnity Insurance Company, John Doe Chubb 1, John Doe Chubb 2, John Doe Chubb 3, John Doe Agent 4, John Doe Agent 5, John Doe Agent 6, John Doe Investigator 7, John Doe Investigator 8 and John Doe Investigator 9 |
3:2007cv00294 |
August 8, 2007 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio |
Insurance Office |
SHELBY |
Sharon L Ovington |
Walter H Rice |
Plaintiff |
Diversity |
28:1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 103 DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANT EXECUTIVE RISK INDEMNITY, INC., (DOC. 96 ) TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 95 ); DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING IN PART ANDOVERRULING, AS MOOT, IN PAR T PLAINTIFFS OBJECTIONS (DOC. 99 ) TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 95 ); REPORT ANDRECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. 95 ) ADOPTED IN PART, AS SUPPLEMENTED HEREIN BY COURTS R EASONING AND CITATIONS TO AUTHORITY; DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING, AS MOOT, MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT TWO OF PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT OF DEFENDANT EXECUTIVE RISK INDEMNITY, INC. (DOC. 7 ); DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, PLAINTI FF'S MOTION TO COMPELDISCOVERY (DOC. 63 ); DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING MOTION TO STRIKE EXPERT TESTIMONY OF DEFENDANT EXECUTIVE RISK INDEMNITY, INC. (DOC. 80 ); DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANT EXECUTIVE RISK INDEMNITY, INC. (DOC. 84 ). Signed by Judge Walter H Rice on 9/28/2009. (sc1, ) |
Filing 95 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT: 1. Defendant Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc.'s motion to dismiss Count II of Plaintiffs complaint (Doc. 7 ) be GRANTED, and that Count II of Plaintiffs' complaint (Doc. 3 , 27-35) be DISMISSED with preju dice; 2. Plaintiffs motion to compel discovery (Doc. 63 ) be GRANTED in part, and that Defendant Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc. be directed to respond, within twenty (20) days of the date of the Court's final Order, to Plaintiffs' Interro gatories 7-9, limited to information available from Defendants' currently open D&O policy claim files; and to Interrogatories 12-13 and Request for Production of Documents 11 ; 3. Plaintiffs' motion to compel discovery (Doc. 63 ) be DENIED in all other respects; and 4. Defendant Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc.'s motion to strike expert testimony (Doc. 80 ) be GRANTED. Objections to R&R due by 2/13/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sharon L Ovington on 1/27/2009. (sc1, ) |
Filing 93 DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING IN FULL THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FILED ON DECEMBER 16,2008 88 ; GRANTING THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANTS BALDWIN & WHITNEY INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., ACCORDIA OF OHIO, LLC, ACCORDIA, INC., AND WELLS FARGO INSURANCE SERVICES OF OHIO, LLC 12 AND DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS AGAINST SAID DEFENDANTS IN THEIR ENTIRETY AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO ENTER JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF SAID DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFFS; AND DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT WELLS FARGO INSURANCE SERVICES OF OHIO, LLC'S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION 71 . Signed by Walter H Rice on 1/7/2009. (davisj1, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.