Barnes v. Yahoo, Inc.

Barnes v. Yahoo, Inc.

Plaintiff Cecilia Barnes alleged that she was sexually harassed by strange men because her ex-boyfriend posted unauthorized profiles and nude pictures of her on Yahoo!.

Plaintiff:	Cecilia L. Barnes
Defendant:	Yahoo, Inc.
Case Number:	6:2005cv00926
Filed:	June 23, 2005
Court:	US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Eugene Office
County:	Multnomah
Presiding Judge:	Ann L. Aiken
Nature of Suit:	P.I.: Other
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 11, 2009	Filing 43 ORDER: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 38 is denied. Plaintiff's request for oral argument is denied as unnecessary. Signed on December 8, 2009 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (cp)
January 5, 2006	Filing 27 Notice of Attorney Substitution: Attorney Thomas W. Brown for Yahoo, Inc. is substituted as counsel of record in place of Attorney Jeffrey A. Johnson. Filed by Jeffrey A. Johnson appearing on behalf of Yahoo, Inc.(cp, )
January 3, 2006	Filing 26 Certificate of Record transmitted to USCA for the 9th Circuit re Notice of Appeal22. (cp, )
December 27, 2005	Filing 25 Notice of no transcript. Filed by Cecilia L. Barnes. (sln, )
December 22, 2005	Filing 24 Copy of Time Schedule Order from USCA for the 9th Circuit re Notice of Appeal22. (cp, )
December 5, 2005	Filing 23 Representation Statement re Notice of Appeal22. Filed by Cecilia L. Barnes. (cp, )
November 8, 2005	Filing 21 Judgment: This action is dismissed. Signed November 8, 2005 by Deputy Clerk, Leslie Engdall. (cp, )
September 28, 2005	Filing 19 Reply to Motion to Dismiss Complaint9 Oral Argument requested. Filed by Yahoo, Inc..(Carome, Patrick)
September 7, 2005	Filing 16 Response to Motion to Dismiss9. Filed by Cecilia L. Barnes.(cp, )
August 3, 2005	Filing 12 Affidavit of Thomas R. Rask, III in Support of Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to a Motion to Dismiss. Filed by Cecilia L. Barnes. (Related document(s): 11 )(cp, )
July 27, 2005	Filing 9 Motion to Dismiss Complaint. Filed by Yahoo, Inc.. (Johnson, Jeffrey)
July 13, 2005	Filing 7 Order Granting Application for Special Admission Pro Hac Vice of Patrick J. Carome for Yahoo, Inc. Application Fee in amount of $100 collected. Receipt No. 4771 issued. Signed on July 13, 2005 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (cp, )
June 27, 2005	Filing 4 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Filed by Yahoo, Inc. (cp, )
June 23, 2005	Filing 3 Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order and Notice of Case Assignment to the Honorable Ann L. Aiken. Discovery to be completed by 10/21/2005. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report due by 11/21/2005.Pretrial Order due by 11/21/2005. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (eo, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barnes v. Yahoo, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cecilia L. Barnes
Represented By:	Thomas Raymond Rask, III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Yahoo, Inc.
Represented By:	Samir Jain
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?