Cases 1 - 10 of 492
Xiuling Wei et al v. Yahoo, Inc.
as 1:2024cv09077
Respondent:
Yahoo, Inc.
Petitioner:
Weiguo Wang, Yipeng Wang, Xiuling Wei and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Assistance to Foreign Tribunals (incl letter rogatory)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05230
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Ballentine v. Yahoo Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv05253
Defendant:
Jim Lanzone and Yahoo Inc.
Plaintiff:
Quintin Jerome Ballentine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jammi v. American Airlines Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04854
Defendant:
Daon, Inc., Yahoo, Inc., American Airlines Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nandini Jammi
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
In the Matter of the Application of Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
as 3:2024mc80070
Petitioner:
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
Respondent:
Yahoo Inc.
Thompson v. Tech Crunch, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01242
Plaintiff:
Walter Thompson
Defendant:
Tech Crunch, Inc., Yahoo, Inc., Does 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Dermansky v. The Hearst Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv01272
Plaintiff:
Julie Dermansky
Defendant:
The Hearst Corporation, Hearst Magazine Media, Inc., Hearst Communications, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Oliver v. EHM Productions Inc., et al.
as 24-324
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY OLIVER
Defendant / Appellee:
EHM PRODUCTIONS INC., AABACO SMALL BUSINESS, LLC, DOTDASH MEDIA, INC. and others
EVOX Productions, LLC v. Automattic Inc. et al
as 3:2023mc80298
In Re:
Automattic Inc.
Plaintiff:
EVOX Productions, LLC
Defendant:
Yahoo Inc.
Tannenbaum v. Yahoo Inc.
as 1:2023cv08749
Plaintiff:
Allan Tannenbaum
Defendant:
Yahoo Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.