U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al
| U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC |
| Acer, Inc., Acer America Corporation, Apple, Inc., ASUS Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc., Dell Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Fujitsu America, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., HP Development Company LLC, Sony Corporation, Sony Corporation of America, Sony Electronics Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Toshiba America, Inc. and Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc. |
| 6:2009cv00448 |
| October 9, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Tyler Office |
| Smith |
| Leonard Davis |
| Plaintiff |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
310
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION, ORDER re 135 Joint MOTION to Change Venue filed by Asustek Computer Inc., ASUS Computer International, Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc., Toshiba America, Inc., Fujitsu Ltd., Sony Corporation, Sony Electronics Inc., Fujitsu America, Inc., Hewlett Packard Co., HP Development Company LLC, Sony Corporation of America, Acer America Corporation, Dell Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Apple, Inc., Gateway, Inc., Acer, Inc. All other pending Motions in this case should be handled by the transferee court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 7/13/2010. (gsg)
|
|
Filing
178
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY. Signed by Magistrate Judge John D. Love on 04/07/10. cc:attys 4-07-10(mll, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
