Cases 1 - 10 of 384
Wettstein and Sons, Inc. v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes, Ltd. et al
as 3:2023cv01882
Defendant:
Samsung SDI Co Ltd, Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd, Tatung Company of America Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Wettstein and Sons, Inc on behlaf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as Wettstein's
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 15 Antitrust Litigation
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Bonsignore Trial Lawyers, LLC, et al
as 22-16678
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION and CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellee:
BONSIGNORE TRIAL LAWYERS, LLC, GRAY ECHAVARRIA, GLORIA COMEAUX and others
Defendant:
TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 22-16532
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellant:
BONSIGNORE TRIAL LAWYERS, LLC, GRAY ECHAVARRIA and GLORIA COMEAUX
Defendant:
TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 22-16537
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellant:
LAW OFFICES OF FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA
Defendant:
TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 22-16534
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellant:
COOPER & KIRKHAM, P.C.
Defendant:
TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Class, et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al
as 21-16291
Not Classified By Court:
In re: OPTICAL DISK DRIVE PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER CLASS
Appellant:
CONNER ERWIN
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA CORPORATION and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-16699
Petitioner / Appellant:
HARRY GARAVANIAN, CHRIS SEUFERT, KERRY MURPHY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
In re: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-16691
Petitioner / Appellant:
STEVEN HARRELSON, WALKER, WARREN & WATKINS, LLC, DONNA MUCCINO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
In re: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-16685
Defendant / Appellee:
TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELEANOR LEWIS, Proposed Intervenor
In re: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-16686
Defendant / Appellee:
TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, HITACHI DISPLAYS, LTD., AKA Japan Display, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellant:
DAVID N. WATSON, JESSICA M. MCINTYRE, ERIC R. COGGINS and others
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
