Harris v. Brown

Petitioner: Ian Harris
Respondent: Carl Clovis Brown, Jr.
Case Number: 1:2012cv00137
Filed: September 18, 2012
Court: Georgia Southern District Court
Office: Augusta Office
County: Richmond
Referring Judge: W. Leon Barfield
Presiding Judge: J. Randal Hall
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 28:1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 13, 2012 5 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the Magistrate Judge's 3 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court; that, therefore, Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DISMISSED; that the 2 motion to proceed in forma pauperis is deemed MOOT; and, that this civil action is CLOSED. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 11/13/2012. (jah)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ian Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Carl Clovis Brown, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.