Willis v. Cavalry Investments, LLC et al
| Brenda Willis |
| Cavalry Investments, LLC and Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC |
| 1:2014cv00227 |
| December 11, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Augusta Office |
| Warren |
| Brian K. Epps |
| J. Randal Hall |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
ORDER granting 62 Motion to Dismiss. This case is dismissed without prejudice, and the Clerk is instructed to close this case. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 08/01/2017. (thb)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER granting 55 Motion to Stay, and staying this case pending the Supreme Court's decision in "Johnson"; and denying Plaintiffs' alternative request that the Court require the Defendants to deposit the funds collected in the bankruptcy proceedings into a court-controlled account. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 12/9/16. (cmr)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER denying Defendants' 5 Motion to Dismiss; and denying Defendants' 4 Motion to Refer. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 7/13/2016. (jah)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER STAYING CASE pending the 11th Circuit's decision in Johnson v. Midland Funding, LLC, at which time any party may move to lift the stay. Signed by Judge J. Randal Hall on 5/4/15. (cmr)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER granting 12 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice for Thomas R. Dominczyk. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brian K. Epps on 1/6/15. (aeh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
