Malick v. Butler

Plaintiff: Steve Lawrence Malick
Defendant: Sophia Butler
Case Number: 2:2013cv00063
Filed: April 30, 2013
Court: Georgia Southern District Court
Office: Brunswick Office
County: Appling
Referring Judge: James E. Graham
Presiding Judge: Lisa G. Wood
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 28, 2013 15 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING the Magistrate Judge's 9 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Clerk of Court is authorized and directed to enter an appropriate Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 6/28/2013. (csr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Malick v. Butler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steve Lawrence Malick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sophia Butler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.