Clements v. Medlin
| Michael Edward Clements |
| Jason Medlin and Brian Owens |
| 2:2014cv00116 |
| August 6, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Brunswick Office |
| Long |
| James E. Graham |
| Lisa G. Wood |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
ORDER ADOPTING 9 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Respondents' Objections are sustained. Respondents' 4 Motion to Dismiss is granted. Clements's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition is dismissed, with prejudice, as it was untimely filed. The Clerk is directed to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 2/17/2015. (ca) Modified on 2/17/2015 (ca).
|
|
Filing
9
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that Respondent's 4 MOTION to Dismiss be denied. It is also my recommendation that, should the undersigned's initial recommendation be adopted as the opinion of the Court, the parties have a period of time to submit any desired pleadings for the Court's consideration of the relative merits of Clements' petition or of any other procedural restrictions on this Court's review of the merits of Clements' petition. Objections to R&R due by 11/24/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Graham on 11/7/2014. (ca)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
