Murphy v. City of Brunswick, Georgia et al
Yvonne L. Murphy |
City of Brunswick, Georgia and Christine R. Dheel |
2:2015cv00029 |
March 3, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Brunswick Office |
Glynn |
R. Stan Baker |
Lisa G. Wood |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDER re: 26 Notice of Appeal, filed by Yvonne L. Murphy. Plaintiff is DENIED leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis; the appeal is not taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 8/27/2015. (csr) |
Filing 24 ORDER granting Defendant's 6 Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim; denying as moot Defendant's second 20 Motion to Dismiss; denying 22 Motion to Change Venue; denying 22 Motion to Disqualify Judge; and denying 22 Motion for Recusal. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 7/22/2015. (csr) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting 7 Motion to Stay Proceedings filed on April 13, 2015. Plaintiff is Ordered to file any response in opposition to the Defendants' motion for a dismissal or to inform the court of her decision not to oppose Defendants' moti on within twenty-one days of the date of this Order. The Clerk of Court is instructed to attach a copy of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41 and 12 to the copy of this Order that is served on the Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 4/27/2015. (csr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.