Ortiz-Alvear v. Lappin et al
| United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York |
| Juan Manuel Ortiz-Alvear |
| Harley G. Lappin and Stacey N. Stone |
| 3:2008cv00055 |
| June 6, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| W. Leon Barfield |
| Dudley H. Bowen |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER adopting re 34 Report and Recommendations. Therefore, the U S Atty's Office, Stacey N. Stone, and Harley G. Lappin are Dismissed as improper party Resp, the petition is Denied, this civil action is Closed and a final judgment shall be Entered in favor of Resp Wells. Signed by Judge Dudley H. Bowen on 6/24/09. (cmr)
|
|
Filing
34
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the U S Atty's Office, Stacey N. Sone, and Harley G. Lappin be Dismissed as improper party resps, that the petition be Denied, that this civil action Close and that judgment be Entered in favor of resp Wells - re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Juan Manuel Ortiz-Alvear, 31 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Juan Manuel Ortiz-Alvear Objections to R&R due by 3/9/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge W. Leon Barfield on 2/19/09. (cmr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
