Ingram v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Sharon Ingram
Defendant: Carolyn Colvin
Case Number: 4:2014cv00206
Filed: September 19, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Office: Savannah Office
County: Effingham
Presiding Judge: G. R. Smith
Presiding Judge: William T. Moore
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 18 JUDGMENT entered affirming the Commissioner's decision denying benefits. (loh)
November 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER directing the Clerk to submit the 13 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS with any objections to the Honorable William T. Moore, Jr on 12/3/15. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 11/18/15. (wwp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ingram v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sharon Ingram
Represented By: Daniel Lewis Wilder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn Colvin
Represented By: Melissa Stebbins Mundell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?