Newton v. Corizon Health Services, Inc. et al
Jeffrey R. Newton |
Corizon Health Services, Inc., Chatham County Jail, John Doe I, John Doe II and Gilbert |
4:2014cv00246 |
November 14, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
Savannah Office |
Chatham |
G. R. Smith |
William T. Moore |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 JUDGMENT entered dismissing this case without prejudice. (loh) |
Filing 15 ORDER directing all parties to be served re 14 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 1 Complaint filed by Jeffrey R. Newton. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 8/11/2015. (loh) |
Filing 13 ORDER directing the Clerk to send Newton three copies of waiver of service forms along with a copy of this Order. Plaintiff has sixty days from the date this Order is served to effect service on defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 6/4/2015. (loh) |
Filing 11 ORDER denying 6 Motion to Toll Statute of Limitations. The Court directs plaintiff, within fourteen days of the date this Order is served, to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for violating Rule 4(m). Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 5/14/2015. (loh) |
Filing 8 ORDER denying 5 Motion to Perfect Service. Failure to serve defendants within 120 days of the filing his complaint may result in the dismissal of his claims against any unserved defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 3/18/2015. (loh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.