Hamilton et al v. Lanier, Jr. et al
| Starla Hamilton and Savannah-Chatham County Fair Housing Council, Inc. |
| Nathaniel Lanier, Jr. and Karen Lanier |
| 4:2015cv00012 |
| January 16, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Savannah Office |
| Chatham |
| G. R. Smith |
| William T. Moore |
| Housing/Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 3601 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
144
ORDER re 143 USCA Mandate. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit is made the order of this Court. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 5/9/23. (loh)
|
|
Filing
134
JUDGMENT is entered in accordance with the re 128 Jury Verdict entered on December 14, 2022. This case stands closed. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 12/20/22. (loh)
|
|
Filing
133
ORDER that upon return of a jury verdict the items entered into evidence be returned to the parties for safekeeping and for production in the Court of Appeals, if necessary. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr. on 12/15/22. (jgb)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDERED that Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file a response to this Order identifying which witnesses she intends to call on this topic by 7:00 p.m. on December 9, 2022, and the Court reminds Plaintiff to identify only her best examples. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 12/9/22. (loh)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER Directing the the parties to respond to this order by December 8, 2022 by 4:30 PM. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on December 8, 2022. (jrb)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER continuing trial scheduled for July 27, 2020. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr. on 6/29/20. (jgb)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER denying re 65 Motion in Limine. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 5/8/2020. (loh)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDERED The Court has scheduled a pretrial conference in this case for March 9, 2020 at 3:00 PM in Savannah, Georgia. The parties are ORDERED to update their Consolidated Pretrial Order dated April 28, 2017 re 42 on or before February 24, 2020. In the updated pretrial order, the parties are DIRECTED to clarify which defendants remain in this matter. THE PARTIES MAY NOT REQUEST A CONTINUANCE. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 2/3/2020. (loh)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion for Summary Judgment. This case will proceed to trial. This case will proceed to trial on Plaintiffs' claim for discriminatory housing practices against Plaintiff Hamilton based on sex or gender. Signed by Judge William T. Moore, Jr on 9/9/16. (wwp)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER directing the Clerk to conform the docket caption to match that used in the Order caption. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 3/16/16. (wwp)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER granting 25 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 2/19/2016. (loh)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER granting 17 Motion to Substitute Party. Nathaniel J. Lanier, III added. Nathaniel Lanier, Jr. terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 6/23/2015. (loh)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER granting 5 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice; granting 6 Motion for Leave to Appear pro hac vice. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 2/19/2015. (loh)
|
|
Filing
4
GENERAL ORDER: Report of Rule 26(f) planning meeting. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 1/16/2015. (loh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
