Smith v. Ramirez

Smith v. Ramirez

Petitioner:	Dana Lydell Smith
Respondent:	Alberto Ramirez
Case Number:	1:2014cv00361
Filed:	August 28, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the District of Idaho
Office:	Boise - Southern Office
County:	Ada - Southern
Presiding Judge:	Ronald E. Bush
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 24, 2018	Filing 60 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. Petitioners Motions requesting Copy of Lodging (Dkt. 39 ) is DENIED as MOOT. 2. Petitioners Motions for Appointment of Counsel (Dkts. 40 , 59 ) are DENIED. 3. Petitioners Motions for Discovery (Dkt . 41 , 54 ) are DENIED. 4. Petitioners Motion for Production (Dkt. 42 ) is DENIED. 5. Petitioners Motions for Hearing (Dkt. 48 , 50 ) are DENIED. 6. Petitioners Motion to Expand the Record (Dkt. 55 ) is DENIED. 7. The Petition for Writ of Habea s Corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice. 8. The Court does not find its resolution of this habeas matter to be reasonably debatable, and a certificate of appealability will not issue.... Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 24, 2018

Filing 60 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - IT IS ORDERED: 1. Petitioners Motions requesting Copy of Lodging (Dkt. 39 ) is DENIED as MOOT. 2. Petitioners Motions for Appointment of Counsel (Dkts. 40 , 59 ) are DENIED. 3. Petitioners Motions for Discovery (Dkt . 41 , 54 ) are DENIED. 4. Petitioners Motion for Production (Dkt. 42 ) is DENIED. 5. Petitioners Motions for Hearing (Dkt. 48 , 50 ) are DENIED. 6. Petitioners Motion to Expand the Record (Dkt. 55 ) is DENIED. 7. The Petition for Writ of Habea s Corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice. 8. The Court does not find its resolution of this habeas matter to be reasonably debatable, and a certificate of appealability will not issue.... Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (cjs)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Ramirez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Dana Lydell Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Alberto Ramirez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?