Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Ramirez-Alvarez v. Garland
as 24-1337
Petitioner:
LUIS ALBERTO RAMIREZ-ALVAREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Moore v. Tewalt et al
as 1:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Jimmy C Moore
Defendant:
Josh Tewalt, Alberto Ramirez, Timothy Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dan Goodrick v. USDC-IDB
as 22-70214
Not Classified By Court:
In re: DAN GOODRICK, JOSH TEWALT, Director IDOC, DAVID TOMILSON and others
Petitioner:
DAN GOODRICK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE
Montalvo v. Ramirez et al
as 5:2022cv04719
Plaintiff:
Luis Andres Montalvo
Defendant:
Alberto Ramirez and E. Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTINEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv16344
Plaintiff:
ALBERTO RAMIREZ MARTINEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC) Montalvo v. Ramirez et al
as 2:2022cv01422
Plaintiff:
Luis Andres Montalvo
Defendant:
Alberto Ramirez and E Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. USA
as 4:2022cv00431
Petitioner:
Luis Alberto Ramirez Sanchez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Ramirez-Rivera v. Garland
as 22-6199
Petitioner:
JORGE ALBERTO RAMIREZ-RIVERA, D. M. R., Y. N. R. and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Allen v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Zachary T. Allen
Defendant:
Alberto Ramirez and Jay Christensen
Respondent:
Liz Neville, Randall L. Valteyi and All Successors in Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Naranjo et al v. Simply the Best Repair Ltd. et al
as 1:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
Rafael Naranjo and Carlos Alberto Ramirez
Defendant:
Simply the Best Repair Ltd., FA Management Inc. and Antonios Fiorentinos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
