Vanzant v. Wilcox et al
| Brad Vanzant |
| Dave Wilcox, Craig, Egerman, Cole, Ball, Effie Reed, Veronica LNU, Greenland, Clark, Corizon Inc, Department of Corrections and Larsen |
| 1:2015cv00118 |
| April 2, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Idaho |
| Boise - Southern Office |
| Ada - Southern |
| Ronald E. Bush |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
164
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. It is ORDERED THAT: (1) The earlier referral order in this case, Dkt. 47 , 8, is WITHDRAWN. (2) Plaintiff's pending motions at Dkts. 147 , 148 , and 149 are DENIED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
|
|
Filing
144
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. 135 ) is DENIED. Plaintiff's Motion for Recalculation of Time (Dkt. 140 ) is MOOT. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (jp)
|
|
Filing
133
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that: The Report and Recommendation 116 is ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED IN PART and REJECTED IN PART. IDOC's Motion 70 is GRANTED. The Medical Defendants' Motion 73 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's Motion to Take Judicial Notice 121 is DENIED. Signed by Judge B. Lynn Winmill. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER denying 69 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting 78 Motion for Protective Order; denying 91 Motion to Compel; and denying Plaintiff's Rule 56(d) request. Plaintiff is directed to prepare responses to the pending motions for summary judgment (Dkt. 70 , 71 , 73 ) on or before July 17, 2017. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (klw) on 6/12/2017).
|
|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER denying 64 Motion for Reconsideration, denying 67 Motion to Appoint Counsel, and denying 68 Motion. Signed by Judge Candy W. Dale. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER. IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Allow Amended Complaint 39 is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court shall enter the Amended Complaint (Dkt. 39-1) on the docket as a separate docket entry. The Corizon Defendants� 39; Motion to Dismiss 23 is DENIED as MOOT. Defendant Wilcox's Motion to Dismiss 32 is DENIED as MOOT. Plaintiff may proceed on (1) his Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants Dave Wilcox, Christopher Craig, Casey Eggiman, Daniel Cole, Travis Ball, Effie Reed-Rodriguez, Officer Larsen, Veronica Ferro, and Corizon, LLC, and (2) his ADA claims against the IDOC. All other claims against all other Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice. Defendants Wilcox, Craig, Eggiman, Cole, Bal l, Reed-Rodriguez, Larsen, Ferro, Corizon, and the IDOC shall answer the Amended Complaint within 21 days after entry of this Order. Signed by Judge Edward J. Lodge. (caused to be mailed to non Registered Participants at the addresses listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) by (st)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Idaho District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
