Larsen v. Fort Wayne Police Department et al
| William R Larsen |
| Fort Wayne Police Department, Juan Barrientes, Allen Glock, John Doe #1, Jane Doe #1, Kevin Damerell and Fort Wayne Community Schools |
| 1:2009cv00055 |
| March 2, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Allen |
| Philip P Simon |
| Roger B Cosbey |
| Both |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING defendants' 69 Motion in Limine as outlined. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 7/12/10. (jcp)
|
|
Filing
64
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 23 motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant Assistant Principal Damerell. The motion for partial summary judgment filed by Defendants Officer Glock and Officer Barrientes 25 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, in that only the § 1983 false arrest and excessive force claims against Officer Glock and Officer Barrientes survive. The motions to strike filed by Defendants [33, 50, 53] are DENIED AS MOOT. Per the parties stipulation 57 , all claims against the Fort Wayne Police Department, John Doe #1, Jane Doe #2, and Fort Wayne Community Schools are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 6/11/10. (jcp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
