Panasuk v. Steel Dynamics Inc et al
| Marc Panasuk |
| Steel Dynamics Inc, Keith Busse and John C Bates |
| 1:2009cv00066 |
| March 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Securities/Commodities Office |
| XX Outside US |
| Roger B Cosbey |
| Theresa L Springmann |
| Both |
| Federal Question |
| 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 41 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant John C Bates; GRANTING 44 MOTION (Joint) to Dismiss Amended Class Action Complaint by Defendants Steel Dynamics Inc, Keith Busse. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 12/21/09. (cer)
|
|
Filing
52
OPINION and ORDER, denying 51 Joint MOTION for oral argument. Signed by Judge Theresa L Springmann on 11/13/09. (lrm)
|
|
Filing
34
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 28 MOTION for Appointment as Lead Plaintiffs and Approval of Selection of Counsel filed by David John Thomas, David Ross. David Ross and David John Thomas are appointed as lead Plaintiffs. The Law Offices of Bernard M Gro ss PC shall serve as lead counsel; Cohen & Malad LLP as liaison counsel; and Theisen Bowers & Associates LLC as local counsel. Plaintiffs to file an Amended Complaint w/in 30 days of this Order; Defendants to respond w/in 20 days thereafter. Any Motion to Dismiss will be briefed in accordance with LR 7.1(a). Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 5/27/09. (cer)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
