Worlds v. Sentry Insurance A Mutual Company

Plaintiff: Carolyn Worlds
Defendant: Sentry Insurance A Mutual Company
Case Number: 1:2012cv00098
Filed: March 28, 2012
Court: Indiana Northern District Court
Office: Fort Wayne Office
County: Allen
Referring Judge: Roger B Cosbey
Presiding Judge: Joseph S Van Bokkelen
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 2, 2012 7 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER: defendant ORDERED to supplement the record by filing an Amended Notice of Removal on/before 4/16/12 properly alleging the citizenship of plaintiff Carolyn Worlds. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roger B Cosbey on 4/2/12. (jcp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Worlds v. Sentry Insurance A Mutual Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carolyn Worlds
Represented By: R T Green
Represented By: Christopher Ryan Blackburn
Represented By: Chad E Romey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sentry Insurance A Mutual Company
Represented By: Philip E Kalamaros
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.