Ford v. Sessoms et al
| Toney Ford, Sr |
| Derek Sessoms, David Gilbert, James Loftin, Wayne Seybold, Don Batchelor, Fred Troxxel, Henry Smith, Madonna French, Jocelyn Whittaker, Fred Thompson, Jr, Brad Luzzader, Jim Bruner, Marion (IN) Police Department, David Penticuff and Mishele Wright |
| 1:2014cv00320 |
| October 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| Fort Wayne Office |
| Grant |
| Roger B Cosbey |
| Philip P Simon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
144
OPINION AND ORDER: DENYING 109 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff Toney Ford, Sr and GRANTING 111 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendant Derek Sessoms. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of all defendants and against plaintiff, and this case is thereby CLOSED. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 5/30/2017. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(lhc)
|
|
Filing
143
OPINION AND ORDER: DENYING 136 Plaintiffs Objections to Magistrate Judge's March 31, 2017 Ruling and Request for US District Court Judge to Perform DeNovo Review of the Ruling and Motion to Stay Order Pending Review re 135 Order by Plaintiff Toney Ford, Sr. Signed by Judge Philip P Simon on 5/22/2017. (Copy mailed to pro se party)(lhc)
|
|
Filing
64
OPINION AND ORDER - STRIKING Discovery requests 55 Request for Production of Documents and 54 Interrogatories Propounded, GRANTING 58 MOTION Strike the discovery tendered by plaintiff addressed to Police Chief Gilbert >, DENYING WITH PREJUDICE 63 Notice (Other),GRANTING 60 MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery up to and including August 4, 2016 Sessoms. The Court extends the discovery deadline to 10/24/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 7/15/2016. (kds) (cc: Ford) Modified on 7/15/2016 (kds).
|
|
Filing
37
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part 19 Motion to Dismiss with respect only to plaintiff Toney Fords claim that his detention by defendant Sessoms violated the equal protection clause. In all other respects, the motion is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 1/11/16. cc: Ford (mc)
|
|
Filing
28
OPINION AND ORDER: Court GRANTS 21 Motion to Stay Proceedings. This action is STAYED pending resolution of Ford's state criminal proceedings and all subsequent appeals. Sessoms is DIRECTED to file a status report every thirty days concerning the criminal proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan L Collins on 5/18/2015. cc: Ford (tc)
|
|
Filing
3
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Plaintiff Toney Ford, Sr. Plaintiff GRANTED leave to proceed on Count II of his Complaint against Defendant Derek Sessoms. All other counts are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDIC E. All Defendants (except for Derek Sessoms) are DISMISSED. Clerk DIRECTED to forward to Plaintiff a blank USM-285 form. Plaintiff GRANTED until 12/5/2014 to either return the completed USM-285 form or notify the Court that he would like to have the Clerk issue the Summons to him so that he may effect service. Plaintiff CAUTIONED if he does not respond by the deadline, this case will be dismissed. If the USM-285 form is returned, the United States Marshal's Service is DIRECTED to effect service of process on Defendant Derek Sessoms. Defendant Derek Sessoms ORDERED to respond as outlined in Order. Signed by Chief Judge Philip P Simon on 11/20/14. (cer)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
